European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 10, 36-49 (2017) | DOI: 10.5507/euj.2017.009

Pedagogies for Inclusion in Finnish PE: The Teachers' Perspective

Christopher Mihajlovic
Faculty of Education, Institute for Sports Science and Motology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland

This paper analyses teachers' points of view regarding the changes and differentiations in their teaching content and didactic choices that they find necessary to ensure the participation of children with disabilities in physical education (PE) classes. The study consists of a qualitative approach that utilised semi-structured interviews, field notes and participant observation as data collection tools. Three subject teachers of PE, four special education teachers and one class teacher located in the Metropolitan area of Helsinki participated in the research. Given this small sample group, the results of the study make no claims for generalisability, but the findings could help other teachers share their perspectives and justify their educational choices. Findings revealed that the participants faced challenges when teaching in inclusive settings by making pedagogical modifications to ensure a learning environment suitable for all students. The findings from the research identified two main didactic approaches for including pupils with special needs in physical activities: The adaption of rules and equipment of traditional sports, and the implementation of suitable sports niches or specific games. The research also identified strategies for creating supportive learning environments and the importance of perceived teaching competence in adapted physical education (APE).

Keywords: inclusion, physical education, pedagogy, teaching competence

Published: July 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mihajlovic, C. (2017). Pedagogies for Inclusion in Finnish PE: The Teachers' Perspective. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity10(2), 36-49. doi: 10.5507/euj.2017.009
Download citation

References

  1. Academy of Finland (2003). Guidelines on research ethics. Helsinki: author.
  2. Australian Sports Commission (2006). Sports ability activity cards. Retrieved from: http://www.ausport.gov.au/participating/resources/coaches/tools/activity_cards
  3. Andersen, W. (2015). Love, Rights, and Solidarity: Sports' Potential for Recognition. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 68(1), 23-33. Go to original source...
  4. Annerstedt, C. (2008). Physical Education in Scandinavia with a focus on Sweden: a comparative perspective. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 13(4), 303-318. Go to original source...
  5. Beamish, W., & Saggers, B. (2014). Strengthening Social and Emotional Learning in Children with Special Needs. In S. Garvis, & D. Pendergast (Eds.). Health and Wellbeing in Children (pp. 303-315). Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Berg, P. (2006). What sets us in motion? - Physical exercise and sports hobbies in Finland 1981-2002. In M. Liikkanen, R. Hanifi, and U. Hannula (Eds.). Individual choices, permanency of cultures. Changes in leisure 1981-2002 (pp. 141-76). Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
  7. Berg, P., & Lahelma, E. (2010). Gendering processes in the field of physical education. Gender and Education, 22(1), 31-46. Go to original source...
  8. Black, K., & Stevenson, P. (2012). Information and advice. The Inclusion Spectrum incorporating STEP. Retrieved from http://www.englandathletics.org/disability-athletics/ resources.
  9. Block, M. E., & Rizzo, T. L. (1995). Attitudes and attributes of GPE teachers associated with teaching individuals with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20(1), 80-87. Go to original source...
  10. Blagrave, J. (2017). Experiences of children with autism spectrum disorders in adapted physical education. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 10(1), 17-27. Go to original source...
  11. Bredahl, A-M. (2013). Sitting and watching the others being active: The experienced difficulties in PE when having a disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 30, 40‒58. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed). New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  13. Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  14. Ekstam, U., Linnanmäki, K., & Aunio, P. (2015). Educational support for low-performing students in mathematics: the three-tier support model in Finnish lower secondary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(1), 75-92. Go to original source...
  15. Engsig, T., & Johnstone, J. (2014). "Is there Something Rotten in the State of Denmark? The Paradoxical Policies of Inclusive Education - Lesson from Denmark." International Journal of Inclusive Education 19(5), 1-18. Go to original source...
  16. Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. National core curriculum for basic education intended for pupils in compulsory education. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
  17. Fitzgerald, H., & Jobling, A. (2004). Student-Centred Research: Working with Disabled Students. In J. Wright, D. Macdonald, & L. Burrows (eds.), Critical Inquiry and Problem-Solving in Physical Education (pp. 74-92). London: Routledge
  18. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
  19. Fraser, N. (2010). Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalising World. New York: Columbia University Press. Go to original source...
  20. Giese, M., & Ruin, S. (2018). Forgotten bodies - an examination of physical education from the perspective of ableism. Sport in Society, 21(1), 152-165. doi: 10.1080/17430437.2016.1225857 Go to original source...
  21. Goodwin, D. L. (2017). Reflections on Professional Practice in Adapted Physical Activity Through a Social Justice Lens. In A. J. S. Morin, C. Maïano, D. Tracey & R. G. Craven (Eds.), Inclusive Physical Activities: International Perspectives (pp. 271-286). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
  22. Graham, L. J., & Jahnukainen, M. (2011). Wherefore Art Thou, Inclusion? Analysing the Development of Inclusive Education in New South Wales, Alberta and Finland. Journal Lingard, B., & Mills, M. (2007). Pedagogies Making a Diffeof Education Policy, 26(2), 263-288. Go to original source...
  23. Grenier, M. (2006). A social constructionist perspective of teaching and learning in inclusive physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23(3), 245-260. Go to original source...
  24. Haegele, J. A., Hersman, B., Hodge, S., Samalot-Rivera, A., Saito, M., Sato, T., & Silva, A. (2017). Students with Disabilities in Brazil, Japan, South Korea, and the United States: Implications for Inclusion and Social Justice in Physical Education. In A. J. S. Morin, C. Maïano, D. Tracey & R. G. Craven (Eds.), Inclusive Physical Activities: International Perspectives (pp. 287-308). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
  25. Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & Sherrill, C. (1994). Integrating children with special needs in physical education: a school district assessment model from Finland. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11(1), 44-56. Go to original source...
  26. Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & Telama, R. (2005). Physical Education in Finland. In U. Pühse & M. Gerber (Eds.), International comparison of physical education. Concepts, problems, prospects (pp. 250-271). Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.
  27. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. (J. Anderson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  28. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  29. Kansanen, P., & Meri, M. (2006). Finland. In W. Hörner, H. Döbert, L.R. Reuter & B. von Kopp (Eds.), The Education Systems of Europe (pp. 251-262). New York: Springer Verlag. Go to original source...
  30. Kivinen, O., & Kivirauma, J. (1989). Special education as a part of the school system and as a classification system: the case of Finland in the twentieth century. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 67-78. Go to original source...
  31. Klavina, A., & Rodionova, K. (2016). The Effect of Peer Tutoring in Physical Education for Middle School Students with Severe Disabilities. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 8(2), 3-17. Go to original source...
  32. Koivumäki, K. (2014). Basic facts about Adapted Physical Activity in Finland 2014. Ministry of Education. National Sports Council - Subcommittee for Adapted Physical Activity, Helsinki.
  33. Konza, D. (2008). Inclusion of students with disabilities in new times: responding to the challenge. In P. Kell, W. Vialle, D. Konza, & G. Vogl, (Eds.), Learning and the learner: exploring learning for new times (pp. 39-64). University of Wollongong.
  34. Larsson, H., & Meckbach, J. (2007). Idrottsdidaktiska utmaninsgar. Stockholm: Liber.
  35. Lieberman, L. J., Houston-Wilson, C., & Kozub, F. M. (2002). Perceived barriers to including students with visual impairments in general physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19(3), 364-377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Lienert, C., Sherrill, C., & Myers, B. (2001). Physical educators' concerns about integrating children with disabilities: a cross-cultural comparison. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18(1), 1-17. Go to original source...
  37. Lingard, B., & Keddie, A. (2013). Redistribution, Recognition and Representation: Working Against Pedagogies of Indifference. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(3), 427-447. rence: Issues of Social Justice and Inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 233-244. Go to original source...
  38. Lüders, C. (2009). Beobachten im Feld und Ethnographie. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff & I. Steinke (Eds.), Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch (pp. 384-402). Reinbek: Rohwolt.
  39. Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (11. Auflage). Weinheim: Beltz Verlag. Go to original source...
  40. Meho, L. (2006). E-Mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 57(10), 1284-1295. Go to original source...
  41. Meijer, C., & Foster, S. (1988). The Effect of Teacher Self- Efficacy on Referral Chance. Journal of Special Education 22(3), 378-385. Go to original source...
  42. Meegan, S., & MacPhail, A. (2006). Irish physical educators' attitude toward teaching students with special educational needs. European Physical Education Review, 12(1), 75-97. Go to original source...
  43. Morley, D., Bailey, R., Tan, J., & Cooke, B. (2005). Inclusive physical education: teachers' views of including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 11(1), 84-107. Go to original source...
  44. Ng, K., Rintala, P., Tynjälä, J., Villberg, J., & Kannas, L. (2014). Physical activity patterns of adolescents with long term illnesses or disabilities in Finnish general education. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 7(1), 58-72. Go to original source...
  45. Ng, K., Rintala, P., Välimaa, R., Tynjälä, J., Villberg, J., Kokko, S., & Kannas, L. (2016). Daily physical activity in Finnish adolescents with long-term illnesses or disabilities: psychosocial associations with participation in sports club. Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health, 13(3), e11699. doi:10.2427/11699 Go to original source...
  46. Ng, K., Rogers, M., & Black, K. (2017). The use of multimedia and the internet in providing global training opportunities for coaches in adapted sports: Case of Sitting Volleyball/Volley- SLIDE. In A. J. S. Morin, C. Maïano, D. Tracey & R. G. Craven (Eds.), Inclusive Physical Activities: International Perspectives (pp. 225-248). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
  47. Obrusnikova, I. (2008). Physical educators' beliefs about teaching children with disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 637-644. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Obrusnikova, I., Block, M., & Dillon, S. (2010): Children's beliefs toward cooperative playing with peers with disabilities in physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 27, 127‒142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Overton, H., Wrench, A., & Garrett, R. (2016). Pedagogies for inclusion of junior primary students with disabilities in PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(4), 414-426. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2016.1176134 Go to original source...
  50. Ohlström, M., Solinas, M., & Voirol, O. (2011). On Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth's Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate, 3(5), 205-221.
  51. Paju, B., Räty, L., Pirttimaa, R., & Kontu, E. (2015): The school staff's perception of their ability to teach special educational needs pupils in inclusive settings in Finland. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(8), 1-15. Go to original source...
  52. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  53. Pirttimaa, R., Kokko, T., Räty, L.. Pesonen, H., & Ojala, T. (2015). Intensive special educational needs and the development of inclusive practices in Finland. In F. Dovigo, C. Favella, F. Gasparini, A. Pietrocarlo, V. Rosso & E. Zappell (Eds.). Special Education Needs and Inclusive practices: An International Perspective (pp. 149-153). Bergamo: University of Bergamo.
  54. Richter, C. (2007). Concepts of physical education in Europe: movement, sport and health. International Journal of Physical Education, 44(3), 101-105.
  55. Rizzo, T. L., & Vispoel, W. P. (1991). Physical educators' attributes and attitudes toward teaching students with handicaps. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8(1), 4-11. Go to original source...
  56. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish Lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
  57. Schraad-Tischler, D., & Schiller, S. (2016). Social Justice in the EU - Index Report 2016. Social Inclusion Monitor Europe. Retrieved from: https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_NW_Social-Justice-Index_2016.pdf
  58. Smith, A., & Green, K. (2004). Including pupils with special educational needs in secondary school physical education: a sociological analysis of teachers' views. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(5), 593-607. Go to original source...
  59. Simpson, K., & Mandich, A. (2012). Creating Inclusive Physical Education Opportunities in Elementary Physical Education. Physical & Health Education Journal, 77(4), 18-21.
  60. Spencer-Cavaliere, N., & Watkinson, E. J. (2010). Inclusion Understood from the Perspectives of Children with Disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 27(4), 275-293. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  61. Ström, K., & Hannus-Gullmets, B. (2015). From special (class) teacher to special educator: The Finnish case. In D. L. Cameron, & R. Thygesen (Eds.). Transitions in the field of special education: Theoretical perspectives and implications for practice (pp. 137-150). Münster: Waxmann.
  62. Tant, M., & Watelain, E. (2016). Forty years later, a systematic literature review on inclusion in physical education (1975- 2015): A teacher perspective. Educational Research Review, 19(2016), 1-17. Go to original source...
  63. Temple B., & Young, A. (2004) Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161-78. Go to original source...
  64. Thiele, M. (2009). Bescheidenheit ist eine Zier: Chancen, Grenzen und Perspektiven sozialer Lernprozesse im gemeinsamen Sportunterricht. In M. Giese (Ed.), Sportund Bewegungsunterricht mit Blinden und Sehbehinderten. Band 1: Theoretische Grundlagen - spezifische und adaptierte Sportarten (pp. 38-58). Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Verlag. Go to original source...
  65. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight ''Big-Tent'' Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry 16(10), 837-851. Go to original source...
  66. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, Salamanca, Spain, 7-10 June 1994. Paris: UNESCO.
  67. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprote.pdf
  68. United Nations. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  69. University of Jyväskylä. (2014). Erityisliikunta. Liikuntatieteellisen Tiedekunnan Opinto-Opas [APA Study Program]. Retrieved from: https://www.jyu.fi/sport/opiskelu/opas3/opinto-opas-2014-2017
  70. Vickerman, P., & Coates, J. K. (2009). Trainee and Recently Qualified Physical Education Teachers' Perspectives on Including Children with Special Educational Needs. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14(2), 137-153. Go to original source...
  71. Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2006). Cross Language Boundaries: Qualitative Interviewing in International Business. Management International Review, 46(4), 417-437. Go to original source...
  72. Yli-Piipari, S. (2014). Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland. Quest, 66(4), 468-484. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.