European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 13, 4 (2020) | DOI: 10.5507/euj.2019.015

Finding a Home for Adapted Physical Education in Individualized Education Program Software

Scott McNamara1, Suzanna Dillon2
1 University of Northern Iowa
2 Texas Woman's University

The United States’ Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004) is a law that mandates special education is free and appropriate for all children with disabilities and includes services in physical education (PE). Few scholars have examined how PE for students with disabilities is documented within individualized education program (IEP) software systems. Thus, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the extent to which PE is being included in IEP software. Fifteen IEP software companies were surveyed. In addition, nine state IEP templates were randomly selected and reviewed in order to determine how they labeled PE services. Four IEP templates were selected from states with an adapted physical education (APE) teaching certificate or endorsement, and five IEP templates were selected from states that did not have an APE teaching certificate or endorsement. The findings from this study indicate that IEP software companies and state IEP templates across that nation are using a variety of terms (e.g., adaptive PE) to label PE services for students with disabilities. Furthermore, many of the documents are also incorrectly classifying PE services as a related service, rather than a direct service which is the correct classification of PE services. These findings support the need for PE experts to be consulted during the development of state IEP templates and IEP software

Keywords: Disability, Special Education, IEP, Technology, Educational Software

Received: March 6, 2019; Accepted: November 29, 2019; Published: April 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
McNamara, S., & Dillon, S. (2020). Finding a Home for Adapted Physical Education in Individualized Education Program Software. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity13(1), 4. doi: 10.5507/euj.2019.015
Download citation

References

  1. Adapted Physical Education National Standards (2008). Why a national standard for adapted physical education? Retrieved from https://apens.org/national_standard.html
  2. Bittner, M., McNamara, S.W.T., Katz, H., & Silliman-French, L. (in press). School administrators' opinion towards adapted physical education. Journal of Special Education Administration.
  3. Bonner, W. B. (2017). Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of online individual education plans: A case study from a south Texas elementary school (Order No. 10263684). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1886131842). Retrieved from http://ezp.twu.edu/docview/1886131842?accountid=7102
  4. Chaapel, H., Columna, L., Lytle, R., & Bailey, J. (2013). Parental expectations about adapted physical education services. The Journal of Special Education, 47(3), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912447661 Go to original source...
  5. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  6. Dunn, J. & Leitschuh, C. (2014). Special physical education (10th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  7. Ellen M, K., Lieberman, L., & Daggett, S. (2006). Getting involved in the IEP process. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 77(7), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2006.10597905 Go to original source...
  8. Government Accountability Office. (2010).Students with disabilities: More information and guidance could improve opportunities in physical education and athletics. Washington, DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/310/305770.pdf
  9. Gray, P. H. (2016). Perceptions of elementary school personnel related to general physical education and adapted physical education in the state of Indiana (Accession No. 10141362) [Doctoral dissertation, Ball State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Retrieved from http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/123456789/200289
  10. Hutzler, Y., & Hellerstein, D. (2016). Adapted versus adaptive physical activity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 33, 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1123/APAQ.2016-0027 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Hutzler, Y., & Sherrill, C. (2007). Defining adapted physical activity: International perspectives. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.24.1.1 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004). 
  13. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics (2016). Local education agency universe survey: 2013-14 and 2014-15. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_214.30.asp?current=yes.
  14. Krueger, D. L., DiRocco, P., & Felix, M. (2000). Obstacles adapted physical education specialists encounter when developing transition plans. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17(2), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.17.2.222 Go to original source...
  15. Kudlacek, M., & Barrett, U. (2011). Adapted physical activity as a profession in Europe. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 4(2), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.5507/euj.2011.005 Go to original source...
  16. Lieberman, L. J., & Houston-Wilson, C. (2011). Strategies for increasing the status and value of adapted physical education in schools. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 82(6), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2011.10598641 Go to original source...
  17. McAllister, L., & Graham, C. (2016). An analysis of the curriculum requirements for K-12 online teaching endorsements in the US. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 247-282.
  18. McNamara, S., Silliman-French, L., Morgan, V., & Stephens-Pisecco, T. (2019). Overcoming adapted physical education barriers through collaboration among special educators and administrators. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals (JAASEP).
  19. More, C., & Hart, J. E. (2013). Maximizing the use of electronic individualized education program software. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(6), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500603 Go to original source...
  20. More, C. M., & Hart J. E. (2014). Developing individualized IEP goals in the age of technology: Quality challenges and solutions. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(2), 103-109.
  21. Porretta, D.L., Nesbitt, J., & Labanowich, S. (1993). Terminology usage: A case for clarity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.10.2.87 Go to original source...
  22. Putman, S. M., & Kingsley, T. (2009). The atoms family: Using podcasts to enhance the development of science vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.63.2.1 Go to original source...
  23. Samalot-Rivera, A., & Lieberman, L. J. (2017). Adapted physical educators' current level of involvement in the IEP process. Palaestra, 31(3), 26-30.
  24. Serfass, C., & Peterson, R. L. (2007). A guide to computer-managed IEP record systems. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990704000102 Go to original source...
  25. Sherrill, C. (2004). Adapted physical activity, recreation, and sport: Crossdisciplinary and lifespan (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  26. Stephens, T. L., Silliman-French, L., French, R., & Kinnison, L. (2011). A forgotten component of special education programming: Adapted physical education. Journal of the Texas Diagnosticians' Association, 40(2), 18-24.
  27. Wetzel, S. (2007). A national survey of adapted physical education teacher certification. [Unpublished thesis, University of Wisconsin - LaCrosse]. Retrieved from https://www.uwlax.edu/grad/physical-education-teaching/theses-and-projects/
  28. Wrightslaw (n.d.). Physical education for students with disabilities. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/ei.index.htm
  29. Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., Ennis, R. P., Losinski, M., & Christle, C. A. (2016). Avoiding substantive errors in individualized education program development. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(1), 31- 40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916662204 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.