European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 1, 45-55 (2008) | DOI: 10.5507/euj.2008.008

THE NATURE OF WORK AND ROLES OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ADAPTED PHYSICAL EDUCATORS IN THE UNITED STATES

Martin Kudláček, Ondřej Ješina, Dana Štěrbová
1 Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2 Department of Kinesiology, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, USA

The purpose of this study was to describe the nature of work and roles of public school adapted physical educators in selected school districts in the United States. The greatest significance of this study was the creation of information base to guide improvement of service delivery and professional preparation. Participants of the study were 6 females and 2 males with experience teaching (range of 2-23 years) in the field of adapted physical education (APE). Data collection included individual indepths interviews, demographic data sheets and interview notes. Results showed the differences in the nature of work among APE specialists. Participants had high teaching loads (44-90 students) and served wide range of schools (1-20), which created quite different teaching profiles. Most teachers were involved in APE consulting. Results also indicated the needs to incorporate issues of consulting into teacher preparation and change the university studies more relevant to "real life teaching".

Published: July 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kudláček, M., Ješina, O., & Štěrbová, D. (2008). THE NATURE OF WORK AND ROLES OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ADAPTED PHYSICAL EDUCATORS IN THE UNITED STATES. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity1(2), 45-55. doi: 10.5507/euj.2008.008
Download citation

References

  1. Anastas, J.W., & MacDonald, M.L. (1994). Research design for social work and the human services. New York: Lexington Books.
  2. Block, M.E. (1994). A teacher's guide to including students with disabilities in regular physical education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  3. Block, M. E., & Conaster, P. (1999). Consulting in adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 9-26. Go to original source...
  4. Block, M.E., & Obrusníková, I. (2007). Inclusion in physical education: A Review of the literature from 1995-2005. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24, 103-124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. California Department of Education. (1993). Program advisory clarifying adapted physical education program services. Sacramento, CA: Author.
  6. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  7. Heikinaro-Johanson, P., Sherrill, C., French, R., & Huuhka, H. (1995) Adapted physical education consultant service model to facilitate inclusion. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 12-33. Go to original source...
  8. Kelly, L.K., & Gansender, B. (1998). Preparation and job demographics of adapted physical educators in the United States. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 141-154. Go to original source...
  9. Klavina, A. & Block, M. (2008). The effect of peer tutoring on interaction behaviors in inclusive physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 25, 132-158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kudláček, M., Válková, H., Sherrill, C., Myers, B., & French, R. (2002). An inclusion instrument based on planned behavior theory for prospective Czech physical educators. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 280- 299. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. LaMaster, K., Gall, K., Kinchin, G., & Siedentop, D. (1998). Inclusion practices of effective elementary specialists. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 64-81. Go to original source...
  12. Lieberman, L.J., Houston-Wilson, C., & Kozub, F.M. (2002). Perceived barriers to including students with visual impairments in general physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,19, 364-377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Lienert C., Sherrill, C., & Myers, B. (2001). Physical educators' concerns about integrating children with disabilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18(1), 1-17. Go to original source...
  14. Lytle, R.K., & Hutchinson, G.E. (2004). Adapted physical educators: The multiple roles of consultants. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 21, 34-49. Go to original source...
  15. Meegean, S., & MacPhail, A. (2006). Irish physical educators attitude toward teaching students with special educational needs. European Physical Education Review, 12(1), 75-97. Go to original source...
  16. Morley, D., Bailey, R., Tan, J., & Cooke, B. (2005). Inclusive physical education: teachers views of including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 11(1), 84-107. Go to original source...
  17. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  18. Sherrill, C. (1998). Adapted physical activity, recreation and sport (5th ed.) Madison, WI: WCB/McGraw Hill.
  19. Sherrill, C., & O'Connor, J. (1999). Guidelines for improving adapted physical activity research. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 1-8. Go to original source...
  20. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.