European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 3, 17-28 (2010) | DOI: 10.5507/euj.2010.006

THE EFFECT OF BLOCKED VERSUS RANDOM TRAINING SCHEDULES ON BOCCIA SKILLS PERFORMANCE IN EXPERIENCED ATHLETES WITH CEREBRAL PALSY

Luke Morriss1, Julie Wittmannová2
1 Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium
2 Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic

Efficiently maximising sporting performances through structuring of training sessions has become a very important focus over the past twenty years. Very little study directly related to boccia exists for athletes with cerebral palsy (CP) and consequently information on performance measures is scarce. The aim of study was to measure the effect of blocked versus random training schedules on boccia skills performance. Fourteen experienced national-level athletes with CP (M = 23.6 years) participated in this study. Athletes were divided in two intervention groups and followed prescribed blocked (n = seven athletes) and random (n = seven athletes) training schedules for 10 weeks. Data collection included pre- and post-tests original testing procedures. Two paired-samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests and a Mann-Whitney U test only generated statistically significant evidence to support blocked training (z = 2.29, p = 0.02, CI.90 = 9.50, 22.50). Despite this, findings and individual cases of improvements plus athletes and coaches remarks indicated a practical significance towards blocked training schedules over random training schedules in terms of improving boccia skills performance. Greater gains across all three boccia skills measured and in total mean difference between pre- and post-test were shown in favour of athletes following blocked training schedules.

Keywords: Cerebral palsy (CP), boccia, motor skills, performance, blocked and random training schedules

Prepublished online: March 5, 2011; Published: July 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Morriss, L., & Wittmannová, J. (2010). THE EFFECT OF BLOCKED VERSUS RANDOM TRAINING SCHEDULES ON BOCCIA SKILLS PERFORMANCE IN EXPERIENCED ATHLETES WITH CEREBRAL PALSY. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 3(2), 17-28. doi: 10.5507/euj.2010.006
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Cerebral Palsy International Sport and Recreation Association (CPISRA). (2010). CPISRA sports manual (10th ed.). [Online]. Available URL: http://www.cpisra.org/files/manual10_9p/CPISRA_Sports_Manual_10th_Edition_Release_009_27_October_2010.pdf Retrieved 19/11/2010.
    2. Choi, Y., Qi, F., Gordon, J., & Schweighofer, N. (2008). Performance-based adaptive schedules enhance motor learning. Journal of motor behaviour, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 273- 280. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Èurdová, J. (2005). Hodnocení sebevìdomí u dìtí s dìtskou mozkovou obrnou. (Selfconfidence classification of children with cerebral palsy), Dissertation work, Univerzita Palackého, Olomouc.
    4. DePauw, K., & Gavron, S. (2005). Disability sport (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics Publishers. Go to original source...
    5. Doll-Tepper, G. (1999). The international politics of sport in the twentieth century in Riordan, J., & Kruger, A (eds.). Taylor & Francis group.
    6. Giuffrida, C.G., Shea, J.B., & Fairbrother, J.T. (2002). Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules. Journal of motor behavior, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 353-365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Hanlon, R.E. (1996). Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, Vol. 77, pp. 811-815. Go to original source...
    8. Hynes-Dusel, J.M. (2002). Practice and motor learning. Physical Educator Spring 2002: Vol. 59, issue 2, pp. 58-66.
    9. Jones, J.A. (1988). Sports opportunities for individuals with cerebral palsy: A brief historical perspective in Jones, J. A (ed.) Training guide to cerebral palsy sports (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL, pp. 3-8.
    10. Lin, CH., Sullivan, K.J., Wu, A.D., Kantak, S., & Winstein, C.J. (2007). Effect of task practice order on motor skill learning in adults with Parkinson disease: a pilot study. Physical therapy, Vol. 87, No. 9, pp. 11201131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Magill, R.A., & Hall, K.G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human movement sciences, Vol. 9, pp. 241-289. Go to original source...
    12. Marta, L. (1998). Estudo piloto sobre o estudo do cohecimento na modalidade de Boccia (Boccia pilot study about the state and knowledge of the sport). Master thesis in Sport Sciences, University of Oporto, Portugal.
    13. Painter, M.A., Inman, K.B., & Vincent, W.J. (1994). Contextual interference effects in the acquisition and retention of motor tasks by individuals with mild mental handicaps. Adapted physical activity quarterly, Vol. 11, pp. 383-395. Go to original source...
    14. Portney, L., & Watkins, M. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice (3rd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
    15. Schmidt, R.A. (1991). Motor learning principles for physical therapy in M.J. Lister (ed.), Contemporary management of motor control problems: proceedings of the II-STEP conference (pp. 49-63). Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Physical Therapy.
    16. Schmidt, R., & Wrisberg, C. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situationbased learning approach. (4th ed.). Human Kinetics Publishers.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content