European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 6, 17-29 (2013) | DOI: 10.5507/euj.2013.002

IS THE WHEELCHAIR FENCING CLASSIFICATION FAIR ENOUGH? A KINEMATIC ANALYSIS AMONG WORLD-CLASS WHEELCHAIR FENCERS

Ying-ki Fung, Derwin King-Chung Chan, Kim M. Caudwell, Bik-chu Chow
1 Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
2 Dep. of Physical Education, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
3 Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

The purpose of this study was to employ a kinematic analysis to determine the extent to which the Wheelchair Fencing Classification (WFC) can reliably predict and classify wheelchair fencers' trunk functional ability, during WFC functional classification assessment condition (without supporting bar) and competition condition (with supporting bar). Participants were 14 world-class wheelchair fencers from Hong Kong, with 9 WFC category A and 5 WFC category B fencers. Participants performed wheelchair fencing actions (i.e., lunge and fast-return) in two conditions (i.e., standard WFC testing condition and wheelchair fencing in competition condition). The maximum trunk velocity and maximum trunk angle (i.e., range of movement) were motion-captured and analyzed by kinematic analysis. The results showed that WFC classification significantly correlated with the trunk functional ability in the WFC testing condition, but not in the competition condition. The functional ability indices were significantly higher in the competition condition than that in the WFC testing condition for fencers of both category A and B. The trunk functional ability of category A fencers was significantly higher than that of category B fencers in a WFC testing condition, but such patterns were not observed in the competition condition. We concluded that the WFC test might not be fair and reliable enough to classify fencers according to the impact of their impairments on wheelchair fencing competitive performance.

Published: March 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fung, Y., Chan, D.K., Caudwell, K.M., & Chow, B. (2013). IS THE WHEELCHAIR FENCING CLASSIFICATION FAIR ENOUGH? A KINEMATIC ANALYSIS AMONG WORLD-CLASS WHEELCHAIR FENCERS. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 6(1), 17-29. doi: 10.5507/euj.2013.002
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Beckman, E. M., & Tweedy, S. M. (2009). Towards evidence-based classification in Paralympic athletics: evaluating the validity of activity limitation tests for use in classification of Paralympic running events. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(13), 1067-1072. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Burkett, B. (2010). Technology in Paralympic sport: performance enhancement or essential,forperformance? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(3), 215-220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Chow, J. W., Chae, W., & Crawford, M. J. (2000). Kinematic analysis of shot-putting,performed by wheelchair athletes of different medical classes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(5), 321-330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Chow, J. W., Kuenster, A. F., & Lim, Y. T. (2003). Kinematic analysis of javelin throw,performed by wheelchair athletes of different functional classes. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2(2), 36-46.
    5. Chow, J. W. & Mindock, L. A. (1999). Discus throwing performances and medical,classification of wheelchair athletes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 31(9), 1272-1279. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Czajkowski, Z. (2005). Understanding fencing: The unity of theory and practice. New York: SKA Swordplay Books.
    7. Doyle, T. L. A., Davis, R. W., Humphries, B., Dugan, E. L., Horn, B. G., Shim, J. K., & Newton, R. U. (2004). Further evidence to change the medical classification system of thenational wheelchair basketball. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 21(1), 63-70. Go to original source...
    8. Frossard, L., Smeathers, J., O'Riordan, A., & Goodman, S. (2007). Shot trajectory parameters,in gold medal stationary shot-putters during world-class competition. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24(4), 317-331. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Fung, Y. K., Chow, B. C., Fong, D. T. P., & Chan, K. M. (2010, July). A kinematic analysis of trunk ability in wheelchair fencing: a pilot study. Paper presented at the XXVIII International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports, Marquette, USA.
    10. International Wheelchair Basketball Federation (2010). Official player classification manual.IWBF Player Classification Commission.
    11. International Wheelchair & Amputee Sports Federation. (2011). IWF rules for competition: Book 4 - Classification rules.
    12. International Wheelchair & Amputee Sports Federation. (2012). Wheelchair Fencing: Rules. Retrieved from http://iwasf.com/iwasf/index.cfm/sports/iwas-wheelchair-fencing/rules/
    13. International Wheelchair Fencing Committee (2008). Classification. International wheelchair fencing rules for competitions (Vol. 4). Retrieved from the website of International Wheelchair Fencing Committee:http://www.iwfencing.com/archi ves/rules/WF%20Classification%20Rules.p df
    14. Porretta, D. L., & Sherrill, C. (2005). APAQ at Twenty: A documentary analysis. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 22(2), 119-135. Go to original source...
    15. Tweedy, S. M. (2002). Taxonomic theory and the ICF: Foundations for a unified disability athletics classification. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19(2), 220-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Tweedy, S. M., & Vanlandewijck, Y. C. (2011). International Paralympic Committee position stand - Background and scientific rationale for Classification in Paralympic Sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(4), 259-269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Vanlandewijck, Y. C., & Chappel, R. J. (1996). Integration and classification issues in,competitive sports for athletes with disabilities. Sports Science Review, 5, 65-88.
    18. Vanlandewijck, Y. C., & Evaggelinou, C. (2003).Porportionality in wheelchair basketball classification.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 369-380. Go to original source...
    19. Williamson, D. C. (1997). Principles classification in competitive sport for of participants with disabilities: A proposal. Palaestra, 13(2), 44-48.
    20. Wu, S. K., & Williams, T. (1999). Paralympic swimming performance, impairment, and the functional classification system. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16(3), 251-270. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content